2020 Census

It is difficult to overstate the importance of a fair census count. When census information is not accurate, it threatens to muffle the voices of undercounted groups and regions, and undermine the basic political equality that is central to our democracy. Institutions across the country - including local and state governments, businesses, nonprofits and foundations - routinely rely on data from the census to allocate funding, define where services are delivered and promote economic development.

 

The Census Bureau is facing a daunting set of challenges as it prepares for the 2020 census. Since the bureau is facing budget constraints like never before, it is planning to collect the majority of census information online, scale back door-to-door outreach and roll back canvassing. These changes increase the potential of undercounting young children, minorities, low-income individuals and other marginalized individuals. Given the current climate, regional and national philanthropy-serving organizations (PSOs) and their members are needed to advocate and educate elected officials and community leaders on the importance and impact of the 2020 Census on their communities. Even without the changes being proposed for the 2020 Census, we know there were gross undercounts of vulnerable populations in the 2010 Census. This is why the 2020 Census matters to philanthropy.

 

 

Statements

The 2020 Census faced a daunting set of challenges. The Census Bureau faced budget constraints like never before, and the data collection was rolled out online for the first time due to the COVID-19 pandemic, scaling back door‐to‐door outreach and canvassing. These changes increased the potential for undercounting young children, minorities, low-income individuals, and other marginalized individuals.

 

Across the state, Philanthropy California supported efforts related to the 2020 Census by convening and facilitating conversations between funders, providing funder education, and coordinating communication amongst local funders to help advance local advocacy. We also organized and stimulated interest in the Census among funders and their grantees.

 

Philanthropy California also advocated for federal and state funding for the Census, convened funders with lawmakers to highlight the issue's importance, and participated in informational hearings to testify on the importance of the state fully funding census efforts across California.

 

Most notably, SCG on behalf of Philanthropy CA led the submission of an amicus curiae ("friend of the court") brief filed with the U.S. Supreme Court opposing the citizenship question on the Census, which would have undoubtedly discouraged participation in the Census. In partnership with the Bauman Foundation and Funders' Committee for Civic Participation, Philanthropy California coordinated 30 private foundations, community foundations, and philanthropy-serving organizations across the country as co‐signers. While it is highly unusual for philanthropy to file an amicus brief, we chose to do so because undercounting hurts philanthropy's ability to have reliable data to drive assessments, tailor solutions, make data-driven investments, identify outcomes, and measure progress in achieving our goals and our mission.

 

Philanthropy California also utilized its platform and reach to issue statements opposing the addition of an untested citizenship question on the census form.

 

Statements

 

Stay Connected: Join Our Mailing List!